Drawing for DOUBLE GG

USPTO serial 75608357

DOUBLE GG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE GG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT1018 PRESTON, STE 100HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk; animal skins and animal hides; luggage trunks; traveling bags; umbrellas; parasols and walking sticks; whips, harnesses and saddleryACTIVE—
024Bed linens and table clothes not of paperACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, waistcoats, jackets, trousers, overcoats, raincoats, wind resistant jackets, women's coats, hooded jackets, sweat shirts, pullovers, blouses, shirts, parkas, masquerade costumes, dresses, T-shirts, shorts blue jeans, evening dresses, suits, jump suits, capes, uniforms, robes, shower caps, beach wear, neckties, bow ties, men's scarves, gloves, shawls, wrist bands, belts, sweat shirts, socks, slips, flannel pajamas, panties, singlets, brassieres, corsets, camisoles, garter belts, evening gowns, smocks; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, slippers, and sneakers; and headwear, namely, hats and beretsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Apr 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance