Drawing for STAFFINGFAST

USPTO serial 75608555

STAFFINGFAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, REID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAFFINGFAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.

PAUL SYIEK THINK RESOURCES, INCP O BOX 922788NORCROSS, GA 30010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035temporary, permanent and contract staffing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 6, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 8, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance