USPTO serial 75608653
DERMACLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2498708Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2001
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DERMACLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MALCOLM B. WITTENBERG
EDWARD D VAISBORT VAISBORT & ASSOCIATES431 N BRAND BLVD STE 200GLENDALE, CA 91203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care preparations in the form of a lotion for cleaning, clearing and rejuvenating skin | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |