USPTO serial 75608711
HIGH-RISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2001
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIGH-RISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLIFFORD BROWNING
CLIFFORD BROWNING WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTYANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal built-to-order buildings for use in growing hogs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |