USPTO serial 75609276
SONIC WHITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONIC WHITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Juan Capistrano, CA
Laguna Niguel, CA
Laguna Niguel, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
PERRY J VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dental cleaning devices and oral hygiene devices, namely, electric toothbrushes, flossers, tongue brushes, bleaching trays, and interdental cleaners, namely, toothpicks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |