USPTO serial 75609545
LELYWASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2543718Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2002
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LELYWASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3155 PD MAASLAND, NL
3155 PD MAASLAND, NL
3155 PD MAASLAND, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
JEFFREY H GREGER MASON, MASON & ALBRIGHT2306 S EADS STP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines, namely, cultivators, ploughs, spading machines, harrows, surface scraper-levellers, subsoilers, landrollers and seedbed preparing combinations, earthmoving or excavating machines, fertilizer distributors, manure spreaders, seed drills or sowing machines for agriculture and horticulture, mowers, and hay-making machines; milking machines and milk extracting systems, namely, industrial robots used in connection with milking machines and milk extracting systems and components thereof, namely, vacuum and pulsation machines, connectors, and machines predominantly for use in cleaning the equipment and components of the milk extraction systems which also cools and stores the equipment and components | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Measuring, regulating, controlling, monitoring equipment and instruments for applications related to machine tools, agricultural machines and milking machines and other milk extracting systems and robots, namely, vacuum measurement and regulating devices, agricultural milking robotic systems comprising electronic controllers and electronic equipment, namely, computer software and hardware for processing and saving and presenting of data for applications relating to robotic milk extracting systems and robots and agricultural machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |