USPTO serial 75609679
DUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Junction, CO
Grand Junction, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Swim fins used for propelling users of personal floatation devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |