USPTO serial 75609725
MYDRIVISC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYDRIVISC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Giaccio
ANTHONY GIACCIO BAKER & BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical agent for use in ophthalmic surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |