Drawing for PROPELLER HEAD SOFTWARE, INC.

USPTO serial 75610090

PROPELLER HEAD SOFTWARE, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2679315Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 28, 2003
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PROPELLER HEAD SOFTWARE, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn A. Gromlovits

Kathryn A. Gromlovits Adams Intellectual Property Law, P.A.201 S. College StreetSuite 2350 Charlotte PlazaCharlotte, NC 28244

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software development for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 28, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 31, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 30, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 28, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance