USPTO serial 75610183
E-MERCIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-MERCIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
lnternet Services International, Inc.
Fort Myers, FL
Other trademarks owned by lnternet Services International, Inc.
INTERNET MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORT MYERS, FL
Other trademarks owned by INTERNET MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INTERNET MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORT MYERS, FL
Other trademarks owned by INTERNET MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BELINDA L REYNOLDS
BELINDA L REYNOLDS PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR41 S HIGH STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | COMPRESSION OF VIDEOS INTO SUITABLE FORMATS AND FILES FOR BROADCASTING AND TRANSMITTING OF VIDEOS VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, AND OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by lnternet Services International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNET MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNET MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named E-MERCIAL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |