Drawing for VAL-PAK PREFERRED ENVELOPE

USPTO serial 75610286

VAL-PAK PREFERRED ENVELOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAL-PAK PREFERRED ENVELOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016envelopes, publications, pamphlets and coupon books which promote the goods and services of othersACTIVEJul 1, 1998
035promoting the goods and services of others by designing and distributing the advertising materials of othersACTIVEJul 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance