USPTO serial 75610522
A COMPANY OF ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A COMPANY OF ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A. ROMANCHIK
RICHARD A ROMANCHIK THE B F GOODRICH COPATENT LAW DEPT9921 BRECKSVILLE RDBRECKSVILLE, OH 44141-3289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | aircraft and satellite electronic components and apparatus, namely electronic controllers, electronic command modules, electronic timing modules, electronic telemetry modules, electronic data acquisition systems comprising electronic controllers, electronic command modules, electronic timing modules and electronic telemetry modules, electronic data handling processors, electronic power management controls, electronic power distribution circuits, electronic recorders, electronic thermal management modules, attitude controllers, microprocessors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |