USPTO serial 75610574
WINE KITZ BEER & WINE MAKING MADE EASY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2919180Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WINE KITZ BEER & WINE MAKING MADE EASY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario, N6K 2X3, CA
London, Ontario, N6K 2X3, CA
London, Ontario, N6K 2X3, CA
MARKHAM, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Leonardo
Mark S. Leonardo Brown Rudnick LLPOne Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE AND LIQUEURS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wine Kitz Franchise Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Wine Kitz Franchise Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Wine Kitz Franchise Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by WINE KITZ FRANCHISE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named WINE KITZ BEER & WINE MAKING MADE EASY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |