USPTO serial 75610868
POISON ZOOMACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POISON ZOOMACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. JOSEPH SCHAEFF
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF KILLWORTH GOTTMAN HAGAN & SCHAEFF LLP1 DAYTON CTR1 S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | RESTAURANT CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS IN THE NATURE OF PRINTED MENUS CONTAINING EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT FEATURES, CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY BOOKS AND WORKSHEETS, COLORING BOOKS, PUZZLES, PRINTED PAPER SIGNS, PRINTED PAPER COLORING SHEETS, PRINTED PAPER PUZZLE SHEETS AND INFORMATIONAL SHEETS ABOUT EDUCATION | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |