USPTO serial 75610869
KAZOOTIE LAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAZOOTIE LAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. JOSEPH SCHAEFF
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF KILLWORTH GOTTMAN HAGAN & SCHAEFF LLP1 DAYTON CTR1 S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |