USPTO serial 75611076
WIPRO APPLYING THOUGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2000
- Examiner
- HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIPRO APPLYING THOUGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bangalore 560 001 State of Karnataka, IN
Bangalore 560 001 State of Karnataka, IN
Bangalore 560 001 State of Karnataka, IN
WIPRO TRADEMARKS HOLDING LIMITED
IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S. LONDA FISH & RICHARDSON PC45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 2800NEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of computer hardware, computer programming, maintenance of computer software, updating of computer software, computer software design, computer systems analysis and integration, recovering of computer data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wipro Investment Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Wipro Investment Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Wipro Investment Limited
- Other trademarks owned by WIPRO TRADEMARKS HOLDING LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WIPRO APPLYING THOUGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |