USPTO serial 75611248
GARDENER'S DELIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GARDENER'S DELIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brantford, Ontario, CA
Brantford, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candace Lynn Bell
CANDACE LYNN BELL KAVINOKY & COOK, LLP120 DELAWARE AVEBUFFALO, NY 14202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gunther Mele Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Gunther Mele Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named GARDENER'S DELIGHT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |