Drawing for SMG WORLDWIDE THE STOCK MARKET GAME

USPTO serial 75611338

SMG WORLDWIDE THE STOCK MARKET GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMG WORLDWIDE THE STOCK MARKET GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK I PEROFF

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND USER MANUALS THEREFORE FOR USE IN EDUCATING CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENTS; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND USER MANUALS THEREFORE FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC SIMULATION OF INVESTMENTS AND FOR CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL COMPETITIONS IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, INVESTMENTS AND ECONOMICSACTIVE—
016PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS AND TEACHING ACTIVITY GUIDES, BOOKS, NEWSLETTERS AND MANUALS, IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, INVESTMENTS AND ECONOMICSACTIVE—
041ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL COMPETITIONS IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMICS; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL COMPETITIONS IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMICS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMICS, AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 28, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 24, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance