USPTO serial 75611974
INDRANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INDRANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42 STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR IMPLEMENTING NETWORKED SYSTEMS ENDOWED WITH DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR IMPLEMENTING NETWORKED SYSTEMS ENDOWED WITH DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED TO REMOTELY SENSE AND MONITOR THE PRESENCE OF OBJECTS, REMOTELY MEASURE OBJECTS, REMOTELY COMMAND AND MANAGE DISTANT DEVICES, AND REMOTELY ENABLE AUDIO AND VIDEO COMMUNICATION INTHE FIELDS OF BROADCASTING INCLUDING TELEVISION AND RADIO, SURVEILLANCE, VEHICLE SAFETY AND NAVIGATION, ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND MEDICAL SERVICES; DATA TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED TO MANAGE AND TRANSMIT DATA BY BROADBAND WIRELESS ELECTROMAGNETIC TRANSMISSION TECHNIQUES IN THE FIELDS OF BROADCASTING INCLUDING TELEVISION AND RADIO, SURVEILLANCE, VEHICLE SAFETY AND NAVIGATION, ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND MEDICAL SERVICES; DISTANCE C CONTROL AND OPERATING FUNCTIONALITY SUCH AS TELESTHESIA, TELEMETRY, TELEKINESIS, TELEPRESENCE, TELEMANAGEMENT AN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED TO REMOTELY SESE AND MONITOR THE PRESENCE OF OBJECTS, REMOTELY MEASURE OBJECTS, REMOTELY COMMAND AND MANAGE DISTANT DEVICES, AND REMOTELY ENABLE AUDIO AND VIDEO COMMUNICATION IN THE FIELDS OF BROADCASTING INCLUDING TELEVISION AND RADIO, SURVEILLANCE, VEHICLE SAFETY AND NAVIGATION, ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND MEDICAL SERVICES; PARTS OF THE FORGOING; AND USER MANUALS FOR THE ABOVE SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 1998 |
| 038 | PROVISION OF DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES BY BROADBAND WIRELESS ELECTROMAGNETIC TRANSMISSION TECHNIQUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services for others in the field of implementing NETWORKED systems and distributed artificial intelligence; computer programming services for others in the field of distance control and operating functionality such as telesthesia, telemetry, telekinesis, TELEPRESENCE, telemanagement and telecommunications; and consulting in the field of specific operating methodology of computer programming services | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |