Drawing for AA

USPTO serial 75611985

AA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol L. B. Matthews

CAROL L B MATTHEWS HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Adaptive media production computer software for use in creating convergence programs in the nature of adaptive movies, adaptive entertainment and adaptive learning programs that can be run in more than one format, such as interactive DVD-ROM format, standard television format, or downloadable computer software program format; interactive software programs created by using the convergence software, namely, software programs featuring adaptive movies, adaptive entertainment and adaptive learning programs, software programs featuring adaptive movies, adaptive entertainment and adaptive learning programs created by reconfiguration with other adaptive movies, adaptive entertainment and adaptive learning programs, computer programs featuring adaptive movies, adaptive entertainment and adaptive learning programs created by reconfiguration with content salvaged from conventional movies, conventional entertainment and conventional educational programs, software programs featuring recorded music; computer programs featuring individual elements of intellectual content in the nature of visual stills, music and audio clips and textACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Apr 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 21, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance