USPTO serial 75612305
A SOFT ADVENTURE EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A SOFT ADVENTURE EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Posadas de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, C.P. 11000, MX
Posadas de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, C.P. 11000, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Conyers Kuhn
ANNA CONYERS KUHN BAKER & BOTTS, LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, T-shirts, shirts, jackets, gloves, footwear and head wear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Posadas de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Posadas de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named A SOFT ADVENTURE EXPERIENCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |