Drawing for FUSION AETEK UV SYSTEMS, INC.

USPTO serial 75612362

FUSION AETEK UV SYSTEMS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAMBOURINO, ANTHONY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FUSION AETEK UV SYSTEMS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Josefino P. de Leon

JOSEFINO P DE LEON SHLESINGER ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MATERIAL HANDLING DEVICES FOR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING SYSTEMS; NAMELY, CONVEYORS, LIFT MECHANISMS, ROLLERS AND VACUUM HOLDERS; POWER SUPPLIES FOR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING SYSTEMSACTIVE—
009CONTROLLERS FOR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING SYSTEMS, SENSOR CIRCUIT MODULES FOR DETECTING ELECTRIC ULTRAVIOLET LAMP OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS AND FOR THE CONTROL OF ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION THEREFROMACTIVE—
011COMPONENTS FOR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT FIXTURES, ELECTRIC ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS AND LAMP UNITS, REFLECTORS FOR ELECTRIC ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS, DEVICES FOR MOUNTING ELECTRIC ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS; NAMELY, BRACKETS, PEDESTALS, AND SWING ARMS; ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING SYSTEMS COMPRISING THE ABOVE FIXTURES, LAMPS, MOUNTING HARDWARE, CONTROLLERS, SENSOR CIRCUIT MODULES, MATERIAL HANDLING DEVICESACTIVE—
037INSTALLATION AND REPAIR IN THE FIELD OF ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED THERETOACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 16, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance