USPTO serial 75612442
UNIFINE F O O D I N G R E D I E N T S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIFINE F O O D I N G R E D I E N T S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3297 LJ Puttershoek, NL
3297 LJ Puttershoek, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTIN LLPSTE 1000 VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Based on Intent to Use [fruit topping] Based on 44(d) Priority Application Based on 44(e) prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or game or vegetables, meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserve, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams and edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Based on Intent to Use [prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta; salad dressings, chocolate topping, syrup topping, marinades, sauces, ketchup and processed herbs] Based on 44(d) Priority Application Based on 44(e) coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, flour, bread, pastries, candy, flavored ices, honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder, vinegar, seasonings, salt, pepper, mustard, and spices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Unifine B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Unifine B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named UNIFINE F O O D I N G R E D I E N T S
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |