USPTO serial 75612674
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Capps Studio Limited Partnership
Chicago, IL
Capps Studio Limited Partnership
Chicago, IL
Capps Studio Limited Partnership
Chicago, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500ONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601-6342| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely providing a computer database in the nature of maintaining and accessing advertising related and other images stored digitally | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Storage of electronic media, namely, advertising related images, text, and related data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |