USPTO serial 75612728
RACIAL HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2000
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RACIAL HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Belleville, IL
Belleville, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned W. Randle
Ned W. Randle Polster, Lieder, Woodruff & Lucchesi, L.C.12412 Powerscourt DriveSuite 200St. Louis, MO 63131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HARMONY; AND DISTRIBUTING MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |