USPTO serial 75612899
BLUE MOUNTAIN ARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE MOUNTAIN ARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane L. Kort, Esq.
DIANE L KORT ESQ PALO ALTOFENWICK & W2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, electronic greeting cards via a global computer network; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing databases featuring general and local news and information of interest to specific geographical areas; maintenance of computer software; and custom imprinting of clothing and bags with decorative designs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |