USPTO serial 75612906
THE MILLENNIUM SHOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE MILLENNIUM SHOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence I. Wechsler
LAWRENCE I WECHSLER WECHSLER & WECHSLER, PCONE BARSTOW RDGREAT NECK, NY 11021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, magazines, catalogs, brochures, pamphlets and newsletters regarding news, comedy, drama, general advice, purchasing and sales promotion advice, and consumer products and services; syndicated magazine and newspaper columns dealing with news, comedy, drama, general advice, purchasing and sales promotion advice, and consumer products and services; art materials, namely, art paper, art pads, and; gift wrapping paper and paper ribbons; greeting cards and envelopes; paper materials for home entertaining, namely, posters, and paper bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |