USPTO serial 75612956
GREAT GRAPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREAT GRAPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATESTHE HOLYOKE MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry, game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; preserves of meat, fish, poultry and game; potato-based snack foods; prepared, packaged and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces; eggs, milk, chocolate milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour, bread, pastry, candy, honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegars, herbal sauces, spices; processed cereals; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; cereal based snack food; frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers and malt syrup for beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | wine | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation for the buying and selling of food and beverages; advertising agencies and dissemination of advertising matter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARITA DE BEER HOLDING BV
- Other trademarks owned by MARITA DE BEER HOLDING BV
- Other trademarks owned by Great Grapes Wijnhandel B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GREAT GRAPES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |