USPTO serial 75613166
Serial No. 75613166
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75613166?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys, namely, gold, silver, platinum, iridium, osmium, palladium, ruthenium and rhodium, gold-plated leaves, gold powders, silver-plated leaves, silver powders, platinum-plated leaves, and platinum powders; small tea pots of precious metal, non-electric coffee pots of precious metal, cups of precious metal, "sake" cups of precious metals, dishes of precious metal, salad bowls of precious metal, soup plates of precious metal, rice bowls of precious metal, tea pots of precious metal, jugs of precious metal, kegs of precious metal, crock of precious metal, bread baskets of precious metal; jewel cases of precious metal; purses and wallets of precious metal; jewels and their imitations, namely emeralds, topazes, peridots, threads of precious metal, chalcedony, sapphires, corals, pearls, artificial precious stones, rock crystals, diamonds, opals, green jadites, jaspers, agates, rubies; huge pieces of precious stones, namely diamonds, agates; wrist watches, clocks, pocket watches, clocks for automobile, stop watches, hanging clocks, alarm clocks; parts and accessories of time keepers, namely, main springs, cases, watch chains, watch glasses, watch bands, clock hands, pendulums, and dials; memorial cups and memorial shields of precious metal; key holders of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |