USPTO serial 75613173
LEARN-PLAN-ACT-REVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEARN-PLAN-ACT-REVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the fields of tax and financial planning, estate planning, small business management, and distribution of course materials in the nature of workbooks and manuals in connection therewith; and providing on-line interactive educational programs in the fields of tax and financial planning, estate planning, and small business management | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EYGN LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEARN-PLAN-ACT-REVIEW
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |