USPTO serial 75613276
NEUROSTIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEUROSTIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL DARBY AND DARBY805 3RD AVE FL 27NEW YORK, NY 10022-7557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, APPARATUS FOR MECHANICAL STIMULATION OF TISSUE, MUSCLES AND NERVES FOR USE IN PHYSICAL THERAPY, COSMETIC SURGERY AND CHIROPRACTIC ADJUSTMENTS; AND APPARATUS CONSISTING OF MULTIPROGRAMMABEL NEUROSTIMULATOR IMPLANTS AND LEADS FOR MEDICAL THERAPEUTIC USE, NAMELY, FOR USE IN BUILDING MUSCLES, NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION, GENERATION OF VIBRATIONS AND GENERATION OF HARMNICALLY OSCILLATING OSCILLATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |