USPTO serial 75613399
DYNAMIC PROTECTION AMERICAS FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC PROTECTION AMERICAS FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MANAGING MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |