USPTO serial 75613628
SUIZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUIZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELE P. SCHWARTZ
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ HUGHES & LUCE1717 MAIN ST STE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk, cottage cheese, cream, sour cream, coffee creamers, butter, margarine, egg-substitutes, yogurt, flavored snack food dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips, whipped toppings, fruit-based filling for cakes and pies and other dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | ice cream, cheesecakes, mousse cakes, ice cream cakes, icings, custard-based fillings for cakes and pies, coffee, non-dairy desserts, namely, bakery desserts and iced tea | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit juices, fruit nectars, lemonade, fruit drinks and bottled drinking water | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorships featuring dairy products, coffee, non-dairy desserts and non-alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |