Drawing for HYDRATORS

USPTO serial 75613753

HYDRATORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HYDRATORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria A. Savio

Julia K. Sutherland Seyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Bottled drinking waterABANDONEDMar 11, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTEREDโ€”
Dec 11, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 11, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Nov 17, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Nov 17, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Nov 17, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Nov 17, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999โ€”
Dec 13, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Jan 29, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Apr 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Oct 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance