Drawing for TRIPLE CROWN

USPTO serial 75614036

TRIPLE CROWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIPLE CROWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROL ANNE BEEN

CAROL ANNE BEEN SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL8000 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of exhibitions of skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, wakeboarding, BMX, motorcross and street luge; and arranging and conducting athletic competitions in skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, wakeboarding, BMX, motorcross and street lugeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 24, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 7, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 2, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance