USPTO serial 75614036
TRIPLE CROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIPLE CROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROL ANNE BEEN
CAROL ANNE BEEN SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL8000 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of exhibitions of skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, wakeboarding, BMX, motorcross and street luge; and arranging and conducting athletic competitions in skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, wakeboarding, BMX, motorcross and street luge | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |