USPTO serial 75614409
Serial No. 75614409
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75614409?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R. GARBER
JOHN R GARBER COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MILITARY AND DEFENSE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TACTICAL, PORTABLE, MOBILE AND AIR TRAFFIC RADIOS, ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC SWITCHES, COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH WARFARE AND COMBAT CONDITIONS FOR OPERATING AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL AND GUIDED DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND THE INTEGRATION OF WARFARE OPERATIONS AT MULTIPLE SITES, WIRELESS LANS COMPRISING MODEMS, MULTIPLEXERS, NETWORK PROCESSORS, LAN TERMINAL SERVERS, COMMUNICATIONS PROCESSORS, INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATIONS HUBS, TERMINAL SERVERS, FIBER OPTIC CONNECTORS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO SECURE THE SECURITY OF COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR VOICE RECOGNITION, IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR LANGUAGE AND DIALECT IDENTIFICATION; RADAR; RADAR JAMMER, AIR SELF PROTECTION JAMMER; ELECTRONIC COUNTER MEASURE AND COUNTER-COUNTER MEASURE AND DECOY APPARATUS FOR AERIAL COMBAT FOR DISTURBING OR MANIPULATING AS WELL AS RECEIVING AND PROCESSING SIGNALS; NIGHT VISION DEVICES COMPRISING IMAGE INTENSIFIERS, NAMELY, GLASSES, GOGGLES, SCOPES, BINOCULARS, MONOCULARS, IMAGE INTENSIFIER TUBES, NIGHT VISION WEAPONS SIGHTS; SATELLITE PAYLOAD SYSTEMS COMPRISING RADIOMETERS, RADIATION SOUNDERS, METEOROLOGICAL SENSORS, IMAGERS, SOUNDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |