Drawing for HARVEST MIX

USPTO serial 75614717

HARVEST MIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2292903Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 16, 1999
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARVEST MIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CANDYSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Jun 6, 2020NCS7NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED
May 30, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 27, 2020C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Apr 27, 2020ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 6, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 29, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 15, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 6, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 30, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 30, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 30, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 29, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jul 21, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
May 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 17, 2005C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 17, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jan 23, 2005815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Jan 23, 2005E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 16, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 24, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance