USPTO serial 75614735
TUBEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2782127Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2003
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUBEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene V. Handy, Jr.
POST OFFICE BOX 52SPARKILL, NY 10976UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION THROUGH UNDERGROUND TUNNELS THROUGH ELECTRO-LINEAR INDUCTION PROPULSION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |