USPTO serial 75615079
PORTFOLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORTFOLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond F. Keller
RAYMOND F KELLER ENGELHARD CORPORATION101 WOOD AVEP 0 BOX 770ISELIN, NJ 08830-0770Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MERCHANDISING AIDES USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISPLAY/ADVERTISING OF ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, NAMELY, COLOR STRIPS, COLOR CARDS, COLOR FAN DECKS, FORMULATION GUIDES, AND DESIGNER/ARCHITECT KITS, NAMELY BINDERS, COLOR SHEETS, AND COLOR STRIPS | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |