USPTO serial 75615115
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2000
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jean M. Dickman
JEAN M DICKMAN SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP2555 GRAND BLVDKANSAS CITY, MO 64108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MEDICAL RECORDS REVIEW, MANAGEMENT, MANIPULATION AND CREATION VIA LOCAL AREA AND WIDE AREA COMPUTER NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dynamic Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dynamic Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CERNER DHT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE CARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |