Drawing for AAC

USPTO serial 75615116

AAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Jordan

LYNN M JORDAN FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOWGARRETT & DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment for processing, recording, reproducing, editing, transmitting, and receiving audio signals, namely, personal computers, optical disc players and recorders, magnetic disc players and recorders, magnetic tape players and recorders, hard-drive memories, alarm clocks, radios, analog and digital portable tape players, analog and digital portable disc players, analog and digital portable memory players, electric wires and cables; software to enhance the capabilities of multimedia applications, namely applications to enhance the performance of a multimedia system; written data cartridges, CD-ROMs, diskettes, computer discs, RAM memories, semiconductor memories, and memory cards all featuring entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 6, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 25, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 14, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 14, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance