USPTO serial 75615682
HI-TAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HI-TAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK J. JORDAN
FRANK J JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG122 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Writing and drawing utensils, namely, mechanical pens, signing and marking pens, pencils, color pencils and copying pens as well as replacement cartridges for these; propelling pencils, ball point pens, pen ink refills, felt and fiber pens plus refills, chalk, highlighting pens, markers and pencils, materials for overhead light projection for visual applications, namely, transparent films in sheets and rolls for inscription with special pens, correcting fluid and film for type, plastic and paper cases and pouches, plastic containers, paper packaging and cardboard packaging all for transport, keeping, presenting and use of writing utensils, dry erase writing boards, writing boards on stands, plastic sheets for writing for use with writing boards with special fiber pens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schwan-STABILO Schwanhaeusser GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Schwan-STABILO Schwanhaeusser GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HI-TAG
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |