Drawing for YOU GO GIRL

USPTO serial 75615743

YOU GO GIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOU GO GIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay A. Bondell

JAY A BONDELL SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP230 PARK AVESTE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016HOBBY CRAFT KITS USED TO PRODUCE STATIONERY ITEMS COMPRISED OF STAMPS, STAMP PADS, STENCILS, INK PADS, COLORED PENCILS, AND A CARRYING CASE; HOBBY CRAFT KITS USED TO PRODUCE STATIONERY ITEMS COMPRISED OF PAPER, ENVELOPES, SCRATCH DRAWING SHEETS, SCRATCH TOOL, AND A CARRYING CASE; HOBBY CRAFT KITS USED TO PRODUCE MEMORY BOOKS COMPRISED OF STAMP PADS, STENCILS, STICKERS, COLORED PENCILS, AND A CARRYING CASEACTIVE—
028HOBBY CRAFT KITS USED TO PRODUCE TOY JEWELRY COMPRISED OF CORDS, BEADS, CLASPS, AND A CARRYING CASE; HOBBY CRAFT KITS USED TO PRODUCE ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS COMPRISED OF FOAM FLOWER AND LEAF SHAPES, MOUNTING TUBES, AND A CARRYING CASE; AND HOBBY CRAFT KITS USED TO PRODUCE TOY MAKEUP KITS COMPRISED OF A COMBINATION OF TOY COSMETICS, BODY GLITTER, AND NAIL POLISHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Jan 31, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance