USPTO serial 75615794
Serial No. 75615794
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824231Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75615794?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamburg, 22393, DE
D-22393 Hamburg, DE
D-22393 Hamburg, DE
D-22393 Hamburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Hurley
David J. Hurley Knechtel, Demeur & Samlan525 W. Monroe St.Suite 2360Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | REACTION TUBES, NAMELY, MICROCENTRIFUGE TUBES FOR LABORATORY USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf AG
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |