USPTO serial 75615921
BLUEMOUNTAIN.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUEMOUNTAIN.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L CARPENTER JR
JAMES L CARPENTER JR HUTCHINSON BLACK & COOK LLCP O BOX 1170BOULDER, CO 80306-1170UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the sale of the goods and services of others by awarding purchase points for credit card use; licensing of computer software; advertising services, namely, promoting the services of banks, florists, greeting card publishers, book publishers and distributors, and credit card companies through direct mail advertising, electronic billboard advertising, advertising in product catalogs, promotional bookmarks, order forms, magazine advertisements, promotional flyers, newsletters, and product display headers; mail order catalog services featuring greeting cards, books, prints, bookmarks, calendars, clothing, and gift items | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |