USPTO serial 75615924
BLUEMOUNTAIN.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2742282Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2003
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLUEMOUNTAIN.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Boulder, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reagan Harris Fibbe
Reagan Harris Fibbe Baker Botts L.L.P.910 LouisianaHouston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing electronic greeting cards via a global computer network; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BMA Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BMA Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BMA Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hartford House, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLUEMOUNTAIN.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |