USPTO serial 75616079
OPTIMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Devenny
JOHN J DEVENNY GENERAL ELECTRIC CO3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06431UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in discrete and continuous processing plant management, namely, software for monitoring and controlling process plant systems; computer software for use in process plants, namely,software for managing and providing access to real-time online data and historical data over in-house computer networks, wide area and limited access computer networks, and networks using TCP/IP protocols; computer software for power generation modeling and simulation; computer software for use over networks, namely, software for the preparation, archiving, management, transformation, extraction, loading and analysis of data to facilitate use of data marts and data warehouses; software for facilitating the analysis of data and creation of customer reports regarding processing plant operations; computer software for facilitating compliance with environmental and regulatory standards; neural network software for use in predicting behavior of plant control systems; and user manuals and documentation supplied as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Jun 9, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |