Drawing for SUCCESSFUL AGING

USPTO serial 75616106

SUCCESSFUL AGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUCCESSFUL AGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD N. ARONSON

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS; PERFUMERIES, NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE; COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK, BLUSH, ROUGE, MAKEUP, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, HAIR GEL; SKIN CARE AND BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CREAM, SKIN CONDITIONER, BODY MASKS, BODY OILS, BODY POWDERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 9, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 20, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance