USPTO serial 75616414
THERMOCAPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THERMOCAPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BARIATRIX PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by BARIATRIX PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
BURLINGTON, VT
BURLINGTON, VT
LACHINE, QUEBEC, CA
Georgia, VT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Weber
John H. Weber BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington Square, Suite 1100Washington,, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal dietary supplements for use in weight loss, thermogenesis, energy stimulation, or addition of muscle mass | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARIATRIX PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by SOMALABS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOMALABS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BARIATRIX NUTRITION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOMALABS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named THERMOCAPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |