USPTO serial 75616576
LEXIMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEXIMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
93556 Montreuil Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Kyper, Esq.
JAMES R KYPER ESQ KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART1500 OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | components for computer software for use in global, public systems of computer networks, private systems of computer networks, and semi private systems of computer networks accessible to selected groups of persons, to morphologically, syntactically, and semantically analyze the questions contained in incoming electronic mail, and generate automatic responses based on such analysis; to automatically route electronic mail to appropriate human contact; and to track and prepare reports on electronic mail receipt and response data, together with instructional manuals sold and distributed therewith as a package | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |